نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته حقوق بین الملل عمومی، دانشگاه آزاد واحد قائمشهر، مازندران، ایران
2 استادیار دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحدچالوس، مازندران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The concept of commitment in contemporary human rights discourse is defined as commitment to result and commitment to means. In the most important international documents, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, governments are the main obligees of realizing human rights, through legislation, providing a suitable platform for implementation, predicting an effective implementation mechanism, and so on. .. are considered. Other human rights documents also have commitment oriented literature towards governments. The approach of human rights activists is also focused on the fact that the responsibility for observing human rights or violating them lies with governments. Because these governments have the most tools and facilities to prevent human rights violations as well as support and realize them. However, the international community wants all governments to observe and respect human rights despite differences in the government system and respect for their independence. In the field of administrative law, due to the fact that the authorities and administrative bodies have many powers and competencies, the human rights obligations of governments become more important. The research method in this study is descriptive-analytical, and we are looking for an answer to the question, what standards are governments obliged to observe in the field of administrative human rights? And what role does judicial procedure play in guaranteeing the right to good administration as one of the important examples of administrative human rights?
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)